|
|
-
Panel wants coal price
regulation
NEW DELHI: The Planning Commission has pitched
for a coal sector regulator to ensure and approve
periodic price revisions of the fuel feedstock,
recommend steps for fixing coal prices and regulate
trading margins while ensuring e-auctions free of price
distortions.
In its recommendations on the coal sector, as part of
the Integrated Energy Policy (IEP) released here on
Wednesday, the Commission's expert committee headed by
Kirit Parikh said: "The proposed regulatory body would,
as an interim measure, approve coal price revisions,
ensure coal supply to the power sector under
commercially-driven long term fuel supply and transport
agreements (FSTAs), facilitate developing formula for
resetting coal prices... regulate trading margins.''
In keeping with the practice now in vogue for the supply
of quality coking coal to the steel industry, the expert
panel has recommended that coal of export quality should
be sold at export-parity prices as determined by the
import price at the nearest port, minus 15 per cent.
The panel suggested that 20 per cent of the coal
produced should be sold through e-auctions. "For
e-auctions to be successful, Coal India Limited should
directly or otherwise ensure availability of coal and
offer it for sale to meet the total demand,'' it said.
On the need for a regulator, the committee suggested
that the pithead coal price under FSTAs should be
revised annually. The coal regulator "should, inter
alia, take into account prices obtained through
e-auction, free-on-board price of imported coal and
domestic production cost, inclusive of return based on
efficiency standards,'' the panel said in its report.
Briefing newspersons here on Wednesday after releasing
the report, the Commission Deputy Chairman, Montek Singh
Ahluwalia, said: "The present energy scenario is not
satisfactory. Energy is a vital input for production and
this means that if India is to move to a higher growth
rate that is now feasible, we must ensure reliable
availability of energy, particularly power and petroleum
products, at internationally competitive prices.''
Stressing the need to implement the IEP recommendations,
Mr. Parikh said: "We pay one of the highest prices for
energy in purchasing power parity terms. This has eroded
the competitiveness of many sectors of the economy. The
challenge is to ensure adequate supply of energy at the
least possible cost.''
Arguing in favour of coal price regulation, the
committee noted that decontrolling prices in a near
monopoly situation was adversely affecting the
consumers' interest. "In the absence of a coal market
with competing suppliers, there is a need to develop a
transparent mechanism for pricing domestic coal,'' the
report says.
Turning to mining, the committee felt that captive block
holders must be permitted to sell incidental coal
surpluses to CIL during development and operation of a
block.
"Group captive mines should be allowed for small
end-users, and a target must be set for the Ministry of
Coal to achieve at least 100 MT [million tonnes] of
captive production by 2012," it said.
The committee has favoured greater reforms in the power
sector coupled with more encouragement for private
sector participation and reduction in transmission and
distribution (T&D) losses.
The committee conceded that privatisation of
distribution utilities "may not be politically possible
in all States.''
However, agricultural consumers, at the least, must be
provided separate feeders for assured power supply and
the subsidy on account of free power must be borne by
the State governments.
The IEP report also pointed to the lack of a level
playing field between the Central public sector
undertakings (PSUs) and the private entities engaged in
the power sector.
|
(JavaScript: Print This Page)
|
|
|
|
|